Fashion Fails of the Week: Emma Stone, Lindsay Lohan & more
Emma Stone’s dalmation-inspired dress, Lindsay Lohan’s just hangin around and Evan Rachel Wood mixes business and leather. WE’RE NOT SURE IF THEY FIRED THEIR STYLISTS, OR JUST WANTED SOME EXTRA ATTENTION…BUT WE CAN’T IMAGINE ANY OF THIS WEEK’S FASHION FAILS INTENDED TO LOOK THIS BAD! EMMA STONE CAN NORMALLY DO NO WRONG IN OUR OPINION, BUT WHEN THE GORGEOUS STAR HIT THE RED CARPET AT THE LONDON PREMIERE OF HER NEW MOVIE, THE HELP, WE COULDN’T HELP BUT THINK OF… ANOTHER MOVIE… 101 DALMATIONS ANYONE? WE KNOW POLKA DOTS ARE ALL THE RAGE IN HOLLYWOOD THESE DAYS BUT THIS BLACK AND WHITE DOT DISASTER IS JUST…CRUELLA DE VILE! ANOTHER FASHION DISASTER THIS WEEK? LINDSAY LOHAN…SHE TURNED UP AT KANYE WEST’S FASHION SHOW IN PARIS TO SHOW HER SUPPORT FOR THE HIP HOP ARTIST’S RUNWAY DEBUT, BUT UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS LINDSAY WHO WAS LACKING THE, AHEM, SUPPORT! THEN THERE’S SUBJECT OF THE DRESS ITSELF…THE WRINKLED APRON-STYLE SKIRT IS AWFUL AND THE BLAND SHADE OF BEIGE –NEXT TO LINDSAY’S PALE SKIN — IS A TOTAL WASH OUT. AND FINALLY…WE HAVE NO WORDS FOR EVAN RACHEL WOOD’S LEATHER GET-UP… OK, WELL TRY… THE IDES OF MARCH STAR WORE THIS BURGUNDY LEATHER TRENCH-COAT DRESS AND A MATCHING WIDE-BRIMMED HAT TO HER NEW YORK PREMIERE… AND SHE TIED IT ALL UP WITH AN OVERSIZED BOW…BUT WE HAVE TO SAY… DON’T MIX BUSINESS WITH LEATHER BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME LADIES…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec78/eec78f7a4a8a7a1738c50f55dedb3a6b89749f26" alt="Related Posts with Thumbnails"
emma stone outfit was good for her………. i liked it for her
Is it just me or does Lindsay look washed out now lol it’s like she dipped her whole face in star dust(coke) haha idk she just looks horrible now
Lindsay just needs to make a porno already.
That dalmatian dress is truly not too flattering, but Evan’s leather was okay… It would’ve been better minus the hat though.
i like the leather dress.
stop hating on peoples styles!geee!
thats joan rivers’s job!
@StrawberryLost20 thinking the same thing here hahah
so when you say “more” you mean just one more person?
ouch..